Jeffery Xiong vs Samuel Shankland
American Continental (2018), Montevideo URU, rd 10, Jun-09
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation. Adams Attack (B90)
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. h3 g6
7. g4 Bg7 8. Be3 O-O 9. Qd2 b5 10. Bg2 Bb7 11. a3 Nbd7 12. g5
Nh5 13. Bf3 Ne5 14. Bxh5 gxh5 15. O-O-O Rc8 16. Kb1 Rxc3
17. Qxc3 Bxe4 18. f3 Nxf3 19. Rhf1 Qd7 20. Qb3 Ne5 21. Rf4 Bg6
22. Rdf1 e6 23. Rf6 Rc8 24. Bc1 Rc4 25. Qe3 Qa7 26. Nf5 Qxe3
27. Nxe3 Rh4 28. R6f4 Rxh3 29. a4 h6 30. axb5 axb5 31. Rb4 Nd3
32. cxd3 Bxd3+ 33. Ka2 Bxf1 34. Nxf1 Rh1 35. Rf4 hxg5 36. Rf2
Bd4 37. Be3 Rxf1 38. Bxd4 Rxf2 39. Bxf2 h4 40. Kb3 f5 41. Kb4
h3
0-1
In this chess video I am analyzing a game played between Jeffery Xiong vs Samuel Shankland. In Sicilian Dragon Shankland goes for the traditional exchange sacrifice on c3 after which manages to exploit White’s major weaknesses in a sharp, tactical style. Finally he drags his opponent into the endgame where a single bishop is unable to fight against 6 passed pawns.
_________________
Twitter → https://twitter.com/surenaghabek
_____________________________________________
Facebook → https://www.facebook.com/surenaghabek
_____________________________________________________
Instagram → https://www.instagram.com/surenaghabekyan
_____________
Video Thumbnail Credits: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shankland_Samuel_(30085388441).jpg